Newburgh Moire Co. v. Superior Moire Co.

MODARELLI, District Judge.

This action was before this court twice previously. The decisions appear in 105 F.Supp. 372, holding Newburgh’s license contracts violated the anti-trust laws; and in 116 F.Supp. 759, holding the first claims of Patents No. 2,448,145 and No. 2,513,646 invalid for lack of invention, Superior was not guilty of unfair competition and Superior could not recover for Newburgh’s disclosure of a prior settlement contract. On February 5, 1954, a judgment was entered:

“1. The First Cause of Action for infringement of Claim 1 of Patent No. 2,448,145 dated August 31, 1948, and…