Legal Opinion

Cumby v. State Ex Rel. Vinzant

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1970No. 42127PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This appeal arises out of an action wherein the State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Boh Vinzant, County Attorney of Rogers County, Oklahoma, sought recovery against Floyd E. Cumby and Maryland National Insurance Company upon three allegedly forfeited criminal appearance bonds. The trial court held that the appearance bonds had been forfeited and rendered judgment against Cumby, as principal, and against Maryland National as surety. From these judgments Cumby and Maryland National have appealed and in their brief present the following propositions:

“Plaintiff’s proof is insufficient to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Maroney v. TannehillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Ramer v. State Ex Rel. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Williams v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  5. Carr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. STATE EX REL. OKL. DEPT. OF MINES v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API