Legal Opinion

Pearrow v. Feagin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1989No. 89-124PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellants, Marvin V. and Joann Pearrow, appeal from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage in favor of Lester H. or Irene Feagin. The action was brought by the appellee, Irene Feagin, on behalf of herself and the estate of Lester H. Feagin, her deceased husband. The Pearrows contend the chancellor erred with respect to several evidentiary rulings and in striking their counterclaim for usury as well as in finding they did not sustain the burden of proving their defense of payment. We affirm because the arguments on the evidentiary issues made on appeal were not made, or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wasp Oil, Inc. v. Arkansas Oil & Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. HOCKWORTH v. First Nat. Bank of CrossettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. National Lumber Co. v. Advance Development Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Hammond v. PedenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. McDanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Pugh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. McNeill Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Troeskyn v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Duke v. ShinpaughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API