Legal Opinion
(PC) Madden v. Hicks
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 7, 2023No. 1:18-cv-00255Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL MADDEN, Successor-in- Case No. 1:18-cv-00255-ADA-BAM (PC) Interest to Ryan P. Madden, et al., 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiffs, DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 DISMISS v. 14 (ECF No. 31) HICKS, et al., 15 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiffs Michael Madden and Kathleen (“Kathy”) Madden, as Successors-in-Interest to 19 Ryan P. Madden (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 20 civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.