Legal Opinion

People v. Ledesma

California Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1987No. Docket Nos. Crim. 21436, 23178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

43 Cal.3d 171 (1987)

729 P.2d 839

233 Cal. Rptr. 404

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FERMIN RODRIGUEZ LEDESMA, Defendant and Appellant. In re FERMIN RODRIGUEZ LEDESMA on Habeas Corpus.

Docket Nos. Crim. 21436, 23178.

Supreme Court of California.

January 2, 1987.

COUNSEL

Robert R. Bryan, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant and Petitioner.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Edward P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Ann K. Jensen and Dane R. Gillette, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

Defendant was convicted of first…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. (HC) Caro v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (HC) Ortega-Lara v. HattonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (HC) Vasquez v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Vasquez v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API