Legal Opinion · Dissent

York Manufacturing Co. v. Fields

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 26, 1985No. 61290Published

1DissentOpala, Justice

The trial judge found that this worker’s claim for her March 29, 1982 injury, though commenced more than a year later — on April 1, 1983 — was nonetheless timely brought. The decision rests upon the finding that the employer “had knowledge of the claimant’s alleged injuries and did not notify [her] of her rights and thus tolled the statute of limitations (85 O.S. 8).” Today’s opinion sustains this decision. I recede from the court’s pronouncement and reiterate my disapproval of its recent § 8 jurisprudence.1

The tolling sanction in the third paragraph of 85 O.S.1981 § 82 may be imposed only on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loffland Bros. Equipment v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Armco, Inc. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Derryberry v. City of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API