Legal Opinion

Nash v. Robinson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1924No. Calendar 31,093PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBied, J.

This is a proceeding instituted by plaintiff to compel defendant to make a re-assessment on lands in Berrien county, to cover its share of a deficiency in the fund of a tri-county drain. The drain traverses the counties of Cass, Van Burén and Berrien. The estimated cost of the drain was $172,800. Contracts were let and the drain was partially constructed. Later the work had to be abandoned because a large amount of the drain funds was misappropriated as the result of a conspiracy between the drain commissioner of Cass county and a contractor. Ta meet this deficiency in the drain funds the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hansen-Snyder Co. v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Tarnow v. Railway Express AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. QuimbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Munson v. Vane-Stecker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API