Legal Opinion

Frankel v. Heym

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 18, 1972No. Nos. 71-1349 to 71-1352PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

Marilyn Heym suffered almost totally disabling permanent injuries in a collision between an automobile in which she was riding and an army vehicle. Injuries included brain damage that has left her psychotic and with the mentality of a five year old child. Her guardian and her father, suing in the district court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, have been awarded damages aggregating more than $1,100,000. On this appeal liability is not contested. However, both the plaintiffs and the United States have appealed from the district court’s determination…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frankel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Thomas Downie v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  3. Carminati v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. DiChiacchio v. Rockcraft Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Shows v. Jamison Bedding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API