Legal Opinion
Rogers Paving Improvement District No. 13 v. Swofford
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 7, 1936No. 4-4457PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.
This action was begun in the Benton chancery court by J. L. Swofford against the Rogers Paving Improvement District No. 13. Swofford alleged in his complaint that the district was indebted to him in the sum of $117.50 for work and labor performed for said district, which was due and unpaid. He asked for judgment, and asked that a receiver be appointed to take charge of all of the assets, books, papers, records, and affairs of the paving district.
The paving district filed an answer admitting the allegations in the complaint, and agreed to the appointment of a receiver. Thereafter the paving…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dickinson v. MingeaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Rodgers v. Carson Lake Road Improvement Dist. No. 6Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schuman v. CherrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Spellings v. DeweyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Kersh Lake Drainage Dist. v. State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Whitaker & Co. v. GrableCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940