Legal Opinion

Schuman v. Cherry

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1949No. 4-8851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice!

This appeal stems from the effort by appellees, as heirs of the original property owner, to have their title declared superior to that of appellant, Ed Pinkert, who holds by mesne conveyances from the improvement district which purchased the prop-, erty at the commissioner’s sale for the foreclosure of the delinquent assessments.

The three vacant lots here involved were situated in Sewer Improvement District No. 94 of Little Rock (hereinafter called district). In June, 1927, the district filed suit in the Pulaski Chancery Court to foreclose the district’s lien for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eddy v. SchumanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Hopkins v. FieldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Shinault v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. Nash v. Delinquent LandsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Rogers Paving Improvement District No. 13 v. SwoffordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pinkert v. LambSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Laflin v. DrakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Roy A. Dickie, Assignee of Whitaker & Co., Inc. v. Sewer Improvement District No. 1 of Dardanelle, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API