Legal Opinion
United States v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided April 16, 1985No. C-84-0860PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
QUACKENBUSH, District Judge, Sitting by Designation.
AS SCHEDULED, the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment came on for oral argument in Honolulu, Hawaii on February 19, 1985. Assistant United States Attorney Peter Axelrod appeared on behalf of the government; the defendant was represented by Richard Sutton.
Based upon the record and the oral presentations of counsel, and for the reasons discussed below, the court rules as follows: the government’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED; defendant Allstate Insurance Company’s motion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Heusle v. National Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Allstate InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Allstate InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1987