Maddocks v. Stevens
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Agreed Statement. Tbe case is stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtEmery, J.
The covenant counted on in this action of covenant broken is tbe usual covenant against incumbrances in deeds of conveyance of land. The language of tbe covenant in tbis case is: “They [the granted premises] are free of all incumbrances.” The breach alleged is tbe existence of unpaid taxes assessed upon tbe land prior to tbe conveyance. An unpaid tax lawfully assessed upon a parcel of land is a lien upon tbe land from tbe date of tbe assessment, and constitutes an incumbrance and a breach of a covenant against incumbrances. Cochran v. Guild, 106 Mass. 29.
It is incumbent on tbe plaintiff to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cochran v. GuildMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
3Cited by6 opinions
- Town of Sanford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Wallingford's Fruit House v. Inhabitants of Auburn (In Re Wallingford's Fruit House)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1983
- Town of Sanford v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1997
- Winder v. Southwestern Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Albuquerque v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.