Legal Opinion
Burud v. Acme Elec. Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided June 22, 1984No. F81-037 CIVPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VON DER HEYDT, Chief Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment.
I. Jurisdiction
Venue lies in this court and jurisdiction is proper under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e) (1982).
II. Motions for Summary Judgment
The standard for determining each side’s summary judgment motion is the same: Summary judgment may be granted if it appears from the record, after viewing all evidence and factual inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, that there are no genuine issues of material…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Donovan v. MazzolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- James F. Jenkins v. Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Ron Tonkin Gran Turismo, Inc. v. Fiat Distributors, Inc., and Wakehouse Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ronald Fink v. National Savings and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- In Re Citigroup ERISA LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Cunha v. Ward Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Cunha v. Ward Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Dasler v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.