Legal Opinion

United States v. Schlegel

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided May 27, 1970No. CR. 838 LPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBOM, District Judge.

In seeking an indictment against Willard Sehlegel for violation of the income tax laws, the United States government in the hearing before the United States Commissioner placed in evidence the testimony of an internal revenue agent. It was to the effect that Jay L. Dunlap, an attorney who prepared Schlegel’s income tax return in 1964, told the agent that he had prepared from summaries furnished by Sehlegel a return for Sehlegel, whereupon Sehlegel took possession of the return and summaries and later brought back the return with different summaries prepared by Sehlegel…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Mallett v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. United States of America and Howard W. George, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Donald E. CoteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  3. Schenet v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
  4. Union Carbide Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  5. United States v. WillisDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API