Legal Opinion

McConnell v. City of Knoxville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

Plaintiff in error, Harry McConnell, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted of selling condoms in violation of Ordinance No. 637 of the City of Knoxville, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $10'. He has appealed to this court and assigned errors.

Defendant is a duly licensed merchant operating a small stand, or store, on Market'street in the City of Knoxville. His stock in trade consists of certain small articles, such as candies, chewing gum, razor blades, and condoms. Ota. March 27, 1936, a police officer went to the stand operated by defendant and there purchased from him a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hunter v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. SenterTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Darnell v. ShapardTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Peters v. O'BrienTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Saperstein v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State Ex Rel. Major v. CummingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Sanitary Vendors, Inc. v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Large v. City of ElizabethtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. PennockMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API