Newton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
The State has filed a motion for rehearing insisting that we were in error in our original opinion^ relying upon the following cases: Parker v. State, 91 Tex. Cr. R. 68, 238 S. W. 943; Porter v. State, 86 Tex. Cr. R. 23, 215 S. W. 201; Williams v. State, 112 Tex. Cr. R. 482, 17 S. W. (2d) 1057; Upton v. State, 48 Tex. Cr. R. 289, 88 S. W. 212; Chance v. State, 125 Tex. Cr. R. 318, 68 S. W. (2d) 212; Welch v. State, 143 Tex. Cr. R. 529, 154 S. W. (2d) 248. We also include Bazanno v. State, 60 Tex. Cr. R. 507, 132 S. W. 777; Archer v. State, 98…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Chance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.