Riggs v. Guedemann
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal of defendants from a judgment entered against them on the 23d of July, 1928. The motion is made on the ground that appellants have not filed in this court a transcript of the record, and that the time allowed therefor by law and the rules of court has expired.
Appellants filed their notice of appeal on July 31st, and a second notice of appeal on September 4th. There has been no motion for a new trial, and no proceedings for a bill of exceptions are pending. No application for reporter’s transcript under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Big Three Mining & Milling Co. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Fiske v. GosbeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Brown v. PlummerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Nathan v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sterling Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929