Legal Opinion

Riggs v. Guedemann

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1928No. Docket No. 6289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal of defendants from a judgment entered against them on the 23d of July, 1928. The motion is made on the ground that appellants have not filed in this court a transcript of the record, and that the time allowed therefor by law and the rules of court has expired.

Appellants filed their notice of appeal on July 31st, and a second notice of appeal on September 4th. There has been no motion for a new trial, and no proceedings for a bill of exceptions are pending. No application for reporter’s transcript under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Big Three Mining & Milling Co. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Fiske v. GosbeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Brown v. PlummerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Nathan v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sterling Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API