People v. Mayham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*849Opinion
MOSK, J.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Carlton Mayham (defendant) was convicted of corporal injury to the mother of his child (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd (a)).1 On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court violated his state and federal constitutional rights to due process, a fair trial, and effective assistance of counsel by excluding him from the courtroom without an “audio or video feed”2 allowing him to hear a trial witness’s testimony. In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that under the circumstances, the trial court did not err by excluding defendant without…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. Toomalatai CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KEVIN C. AMBROSE (15-06-1870, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021