Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlos Hernandes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 15, 2013No. 11-50669PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Carlos Zuniga Hernandes is a federal prisoner who has pleaded' guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine. After sentencing, Her-nandes filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claiming inter alia that his trial counsel represented him while under a conflict of interest, because according to Hernandes, counsel was referred to him by a co-defendant and the co-defendant paid a portion of the cost of retaining counsel. The district court found that Hernandes had failed to show a conflict of interest and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. KeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. In Re LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Derrek ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. VialvaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Andre McDanielsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Chris Gilkers v. Darrel Vannoy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Andrew ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API