Legal Opinion

Trivedi v. CUREXO TECHNOLOGY CORP.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 2010No. A127283PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.

I

INTRODUCTION

Appellant Curexo Technology Corporation (Curexo) appeals from the denial of its motion to compel arbitration of employment-related claims brought by Curexo’s former employee, respondent Ramesh C. Trivedi (Trivedi). Curexo contends the trial court erred in finding that the arbitration clause contained in the parties’ employment agreement was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable. Alternatively, Curexo argues that if the arbitration clause was properly found unconscionable, the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to sever the offending…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Stevenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Ajamian v. Cantorco2e. L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Samaniego v. Empire Today, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API