Price v. Cleveland Trust Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By DOYLE, J.
In writing on this appeal, it is not deemed necessary to restate the contents of the various pleadings and judgments, all of which are well known to counsel. The following principles of law and conclusions we’believe to be determinative.
*608A petition which alleges an express contract to pay for services rendered and is subsequently amended to further allege an implied contract to pay for such services, states but a single cause of action, and the additional allegation in the amended petition is not barred' by a statute of limitations if the statute had not tolled when the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. Goodyear Aircraft Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Markland v. HarleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Weinstein v. NewmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Nussbaum v. Wooster Baptist TempleOhio Court of Appeals · 1953