Weinstein v. Newman
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.
' The plaintiff-appellee describes this action, in which he obtained a judgment from which the defendant-appellant took this appeal, as one “in quantum meruit on an implied contract for the reasonable value of services rendered by the plaintiff, a real estate broker who was orally requested by the defendant to procure a certain parcel of real estate for him.5 ’
The plaintiff testified that the defendant expressly promised to pay him for his services, but there was no evidence as to any agreement as to the amount of compensation.
The defendant denied that he had entered into any contract with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Theiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Carlson v. KrantzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Robinette v. Hubbard Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
- Potter v. . CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Keller v. HoldermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ostendorf-Morris Co. v. SlymanOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Martin v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- S.P. Drilling Servs., Inc. v. Cooper's Excavating, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Chuma v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023