West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. Norton
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is the motion of Defendant Director, West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection (DEP, the State Defendant) to dismiss this action because, inter alia, it is barred by the Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution. 2 The motion is DENIED.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Allegations in the Complaint are taken to be true for purposes of this motion. Plaintiff is a nonprofit statewide conservation organization. Defendants Norton and Owens (Federal Defendants) administer, oversee, and enforce the provisions of the Surface…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Artichoke Joe's v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
- West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. NortonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001
- West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. v. HuffmanDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2009