State v. Yeoumans
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Jack David Yeoumans, III, appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. He challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, contending that a drug detection dog’s alert on his vehicle did not give the police probable cause for a warrantless search of the vehicle’s interior.
I
FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In January 7, 2005, Police Officer Marty Ryan saw Yeoumans fueling his pickup at a service station. Officer Ryan had previously received information that Yeoumans was selling and using methamphetamine, so he approached…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. FodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. Steven Clay AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Villa-GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. HessIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Marcos A. RenteriaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.