Legal Opinion

State v. Yeoumans

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 2007No. 33153PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Jack David Yeoumans, III, appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. He challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, contending that a drug detection dog’s alert on his vehicle did not give the police probable cause for a warrantless search of the vehicle’s interior.

I

FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In January 7, 2005, Police Officer Marty Ryan saw Yeoumans fueling his pickup at a service station. Officer Ryan had previously received information that Yeoumans was selling and using methamphetamine, so he approached…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. State v. FodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. Steven Clay AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. Villa-GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. HessIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. Marcos A. RenteriaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API