Legal Opinion

State v. Steven Clay Anderson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2012No. 39187PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

During a traffic stop, police officers searched Steven Clay Anderson’s vehicle based on a drug dog’s alert on the exterior of the vehicle, as well as other suspicious circumstances. The district court denied Anderson’s motion to suppress evidence found during the search, holding that probable cause did not dissipate when the same dog failed to alert a second time when placed inside the vehicle. On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted review and affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

At approximately 11:00 p.m. on February 28, 2008, Anderson was stopped for a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. GrubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Bloate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Christopher George StormSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. State v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. Dustin Thomas ArmstrongIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. AmstutzIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API