Legal Opinion
State v. Bryant
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1982No. 5857PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Judge.
Does the term “stolen” as utilized in the statute declaring it to be a crime to receive stolen property contrary to § 30-16-11, N.M.S.A.1978, encompass “embezzled” property? We hold that it does not.
The State appeals an order of the trial court which dismissed, prior to trial, a criminal complaint charging the defendant Ken Bryant with receiving stolen property having a value in excess of $2,500.00.
For the purpose of the Court’s consideration of defendant’s motion to dismiss, both the State and defense agreed to the following stipulation:
The state’s version of the case,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Bird v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. StovallWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Commonwealth v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PedroncelliNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Perez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Leyba v. RengerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Dunn ex rel. Estate of Cortez v. State ex rel. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. BrooksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.