Legal Opinion

Phillip Cordell v. Glen McKinney

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 16, 2014No. 13-4203PublishedCited by 290 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Phillip Cordell filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Deputy Sheriff Glen McKinney ran afoul of the Constitution’s guarantees under the Eighth Amendment when he slammed Cordell, who was handcuffed and restrained, headfirst into a concrete wall. The district court rejected Cordell’s suit, granting summary judgment and qualified immunity to Deputy McKinney. A genuine dispute as to several material facts exists, however, and if Cordell’s version of events is credited, a reasonable jury could conclude that Deputy McKinney inflicted serious pain…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by290 opinions

  1. Michele Rafferty v. Trumbull Cty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Joseph Johnson v. Clair SootsmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  3. Melissa Standifer v. Jacob LaconCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. State v. GueinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. Wicker v. LawlessDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017

285 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API