Legal Opinion
Sead Pilica v. John Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 15, 2004No. 02-4348PublishedCited by 193 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARBLEY, District Judge.
Petitioner, Sead Pilica, is a native and citizen of Yugoslavia. He seeks reversal of the October 30, 2002, decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or the “Board”) affirming the denial of his asylum application and denying his motion to remand. Petitioner argues (1) that the BIA abused its discretion by denying the motion to remand in a summary decision; (2) that the BIA erred by applying the current standard of review to his appeal rather than the standard in effect when his case commenced; and (3) that the denial of asylum by the Immigration Judge…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- Jian Xing Huang v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Maricela M. Fernandez, Danelia Fernandez Covarrubias v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Gourgen Movsisian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Khalili v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Ferdinand Liti v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.