Deborah L. Haines v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Deborah L. Haines petitions for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s failure to reopen her appeal and reconsider its final decision in her case. Because the letter from the Clerk of the Board informing Ms. Haines that the Board did not plan to reopen her appeal is not a “final order or decision” of the Board, the only kind of Board action over which we may exercise appellate subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295 (1988), our organic statute, we dismiss.
BACKGROUND
Ms. Haines worked as a contract administrator in the Defense Logistics Agency. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- IMMUNOCEPT, LLC v. Fulbright & Jaworski, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- David K. Schafer v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Weed v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- McCarthy v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.