Legal Opinion

Liberty Sign Company v. Newsom

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1968No. B-390PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

This suit was brought by Liberty Sign Company to recover accrued rent, liquidated damages and attorney’s fees alleged to be owing under its advertising display sign rental contract with Lee E. Newsom. The Court of Civil Appeals held that Liberty is not entitled to liquidated damages because: (1) Liberty had breached the lease contract by failing to replace the signs after they were removed by New-som’s assignee; and (2) Liberty, by demanding and accepting payment of accrued rent, had lost its alternative right to terminate the lease and claim liquidated damages. We do not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell's, Inc. v. FriedmanTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Williams v. WyrickTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Cooksey v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Preferred Life Insurance Company v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. In re Clerc Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Twelve Oaks Tower I, Ltd. v. Premier Allergy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Interstate Fire Insurance Co. v. First Tape, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  3. 718 Associates, Ltd. v. Sunwest N.O.P., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  4. Mr. W. Fireworks, Inc. v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Murphy v. Cintas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API