Legal Opinion
Blair v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided December 15, 1993No. Civ. A. C93-0189P(H)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim to relief. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The Court has reviewed the various memoranda and has discussed the issues with counsel. For the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, the Court will sustain Defendant’s Motion.
I
In reviewing Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Court must accept as true the material facts as Plaintiffs present them. Collins v. Nagle, 892 F.2d 489, 493 (6th Cir.1989). Blair and Courtesy Auto (hereinafter collectively referred to as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. HornungKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
- Ben Collins v. John NagleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Dr. Luel P. Overstreet v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nicholas Crivelli Nicholas Crivelli Chevrolet, Inc. Nicholas Crivelli and Orland Crivelli, T/d/b/a Crivelli Enterprises v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Field v. CostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Hunt Enterprises, Inc. v. John Deere Industrial Equipment Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1997
- Epps Chevrolet Co. v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
- Pung v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.