Legal Opinion

Pung v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1997No. Docket No. 190842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

Defendant appeals by leave granted from an order of the circuit court denying its motion for summary disposition. We reverse.

Plaintiff M&M Chevrolet, Inc., entered into an agreement to purchase the assets of plaintiff Archie Oldsmobile/AMC, Inc. Because both parties were franchisees of General Motors Corporation (GMC), the agreement was expressly conditioned on approval by gmc. Gmc declined to give its approval and plaintiffs thereafter brought this action. Defendant challenged M&M’s standing to bring an action under the Michigan dealer act (mda), MCL 445.1561 et seq.; MSA 19.856(21) et seq.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson’s Vehicle Sales, Inc v. Omc-LincolnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Blair v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rochester Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Pung v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API