Legal Opinion

Verizon North v. Strand

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 28, 2004No. 02-2322Published

1Opinion of the Court

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Verizon North et al. v. Strand et al. No. 02-2322 ELECTRONIC CITATION:

2004 FED App. 0123P (6th Cir.)

File Name: 04a0123p.06 _________________ COUNSEL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ARGUED: Michael A. Nickerson, OFFICE OF THE FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellants. _________________ Gerald Masoudi, KIRKLAND & ELLIS, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Michael A. Nickerson, OFFICE VERIZON NORTH INC. et al., X OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Plaintiffs-Appellees, -…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API