Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Fussell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Fa/yette District Court.— Hon. L. E. Feulows, Judge. Application of the executors of the estate of Rachel Fussell, deceased, for an order directing the sale of certain real estate. It 'was denied, and the executors appeal.—

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

Rachel Fussell died testate December 15, 1902. Her will bearing date January 24, 1898, was admitted to probate, and Martin II. and Horton V. Fussell appointed executors. The fifth clause devised certain real estate to her daughter, Dorcas Stansberry, “ to have and to hold to her the said Dorcas Stansberry during her natural life, with remainder to her children, share and share alike. *499Provided, however, that in case the two promissory notes held and owned by me against the said Dorcas Stansberry and L. L. Stansberry shall not have been paid within one year after my decease, then I authorize…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. KearneyNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  2. Bush v. StanleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Farmers & Mechanics v. FlintSupreme Court of Vermont · 1845

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. McCuneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Jones v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Stephenson v. NorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Butler Bros. v. TwinehamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. In Re Estate of MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API