Legal Opinion

Butler Bros. v. Twineham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 30, 1932No. 30,247PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This action involves the liability of a surety who signed an appeal bond for a party who later became a bankrupt. The surety was held liable notwithstanding the principal debtor who took the appeal was adjudged to be released from the debt in the bankruptcy proceeding, but the-surety--Was .held liable on the bond. An appeal was taken from the judgment.;

It appears that P. E. Twineham was indebted to'Butler Brothers in the sum of $272.11, and that a judgment was rendered' against him on March 29, 1929, in the city court of Kansas City.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Zavelo v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Hill v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Sibley v. NasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Citizens Loan Ass'n v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Federal National Bank v. KoppelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garnett State Savings Bank v. TushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Cosgrove v. TraceyOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Johnson v. BondurantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Sedan State Bank v. StephensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Flowers v. TerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API