Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 10, 2013No. 11-1471PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Before the court is a challenge to the regulatory mechanism for the recovery by an investor-owned public utility of the cost of three transmission projects in its transmission rates. In 2007, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted various rate incentives to encourage the construction of three projects by the Southern California Edison Company (“SoCal Edison”). The beneficial rate treatment included incentives to be added to a base rate of return for the projects. Later that year, SoCal Edison filed revisions to its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Maine v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Constellation Mystic Power v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- MISO Transmission Owners v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Citadel FNGE Ltd. v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.