Legal Opinion

Aycock v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1978No. 55626PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

This case presents one issue: Is the oily substance found in the appellant’s possession to be legally classified as Schedule I tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or as marijuana? Chemically, it has characteristics of both; legally, it must be one or the other. The distinction is more than academic. If this small amount of fluid is classified as marijuana, the appellant is guilty of a misdemeanor; if THC, the appellant is guilty of a felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison. An analysis of the relevant statutory provisions together with the available scientific evidence leads to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Glustrom v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Riley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. People v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DerenneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hartley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Osborn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Head v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API