Glustrom v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
The courts of this country, including the Supreme Court of the United States, have long recognized the right of an administrative agency of government to make rules and regulations to carry into effect a law already enacted. Georgia Railroad v. Smith, 70 Ga. 694; Southern Railway Co. v. Melton, 133 Ga. 282 (65 S. E. 665); Bohannon v. Duncan, 185 Ga. 840 (196 S. E. 897); Zuber v. Southern Ry. Co., 9 Ga. App. 539 (71 S. E. 937); U. S. v. Grimaud, 220 U. S. 506 (31 Sup. Ct. 480, 55 L. ed. 563). The power to adopt rules and regulations differs from the power to enact a law. Georgia…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Georgia Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Southern Railway Co. v. MeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Bohannon v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Gee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Riley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Ledford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Pearle Optical of Monroeville, Inc. v. State Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.