Legal Opinion

Wise v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,699PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

On August 5, 1935, Wise filed a petition against H. M. Byllesby & Co. and certain of its officers, praying a writ of mandamus to compel them to permit petitioner and his duly authorized agents and attorneys to examine at reasonable and appropriate times the books, records, etc., of the corporation. The petition was based on section 45 of the Business Corporation Act (Ill. State Bar Stats. 1935, ch. 32, fl 45, p. 857). It was averred in the petition that for at least six months prior to July 13,1935, and continuously since that date, petitioner ivas a stockholder of defendant corporation; that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stone v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Venner v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Furst v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Miller v. SpanogleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  5. People Ex Rel. Hollingshead v. American Discount Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tucson Gas & Electric Company v. SchantzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  2. Weigel v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Meyer v. Ford Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Poe v. MARQUETTE CEMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  5. Tasner v. U. S. Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API