Legal Opinion

People v. Gushlaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1985No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the court erred in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 without holding a hearing (see, People v Russo, 78 AD2d 557), the defect was cured when the court held a hearing on the People’s motion to reargue. It was also error to charge the People with the 19 days during which they failed to furnish the minutes of the Grand Jury proceedings. CPL 30.30 is a trial readiness rule; delay occasioned by the People’s failure to comply with discovery requests does not affect their continued readiness to proceed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RunionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. People v. AliceaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. GushlawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PickensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. StraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API