Legal Opinion
Ganges School District No. 4 v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1951No. Docket 73, Calendar 45,015PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
In 1948 defendant Smith was employed as a teacher by plaintiff school district, which now claims it had no other employees. She was injured in an altercation with the mother of 1 of her pupils and filed claim for workmen’s compensation. At the hearing before the deputy commissioner the following occurred:
“The Commissioner: May it be stipulated that both the employer and the employee were subject to the compensation law?
“Mr. Chappell ‘(Representing the school district): Yes.”
The claim was opposed'on the ground that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment. From an award…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Taylor v. Blackwell Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Vaivida v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Williams v. BranumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Cofrode v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brix v. General Accident & Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Clark v. Apex Foundry, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Fergus v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Fergus v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973