Legal Opinion

Linser v. Office of Attorney General

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2003No. 20030184PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] The Department of Human Services (“Department”) appealed from a district court judgment reversing a Department order terminating Medicaid benefits to Jay Linser because his available assets exceed the maximum allowed. We conclude a preponderance of the evidence supports the Department’s finding that Linser failed to establish the assets in the Jay Linser Special Needs Trust are not “actually available” to him and, consequently, his assets exceed the maximum allowable assets for receipt of Medicaid benefits. We, therefore, reverse the district court judgment and reinstate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hecker v. Stark County Social Service BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Marcus v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Opp v. Ward County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Schmidt v. Ward County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wagner v. Sheridan County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mary Scanlan v. Marshall EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Huff v. NORTH DAKOTA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS-INVESTIGATIVE PANEL BNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Barkema TrustSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Makedonsky v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Estate of Pladson v. Traill County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API