Legal Opinion
Reichenbach v. Haydock
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided December 21, 2017No. AC 16-P-1427PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWolohojian, J.
*793 *567 In 2008, the plaintiffs bought an oceanfront property with the plan to demolish the existing house and build a new residence. Two of the neighbors (the defendants, Timothy Haydock and Barbara Moss) vigorously objected and are alleged to have for years employed a variety of means-some petitioning activity within the meaning of the "anti-SLAPP" statute, G. L. c. 231, § 59H, some not-designed to block the project. This suit arises out of that campaign, which the plaintiffs allege deprived them of their constitutional right to enjoy their property in violation of the Massachusetts Civil Rights…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Bell v. MazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Batchelder v. Allied Stores Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Office One, Inc. v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richard E. Moylan, Plaintiff/Counterclaim v. Axe Murderer Tours Guam, INC. Paseo View Properties, INC. E.C. Development, LLP JOHN DOE COMPANIES 1-5 AND JOHN DOES A-M, Defendant/Counterclaimants/Third-Party v. Douglas Moylan, Third-PartySupreme Court of Guam · 2021
- Citizens Ins. Co. of Am. v. 290 Auto Body, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- Bristol Asphalt Co., Inc. v. Rochester Bituminous Products, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2023
- Bristol Asphalt, Co., Inc. v. Rochester Bituminous Products, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024
- Ferguson v. MaximMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.