Legal Opinion
United States v. Redd
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 4, 2009No. 08-60195PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Starsky Redd appeals the determination that his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is time-barred. We affirm.
I
Redd was found guilty and sentenced. He filed a notice of appeal in May 2002, and in July 2002 he filed a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motion for a new trial. The district court denied the motion in September 2002, because Redd had already filed his appeal. Redd appealed that decision, and that appeal was consolidated with his initial, direct appeal.
In December 2003, this court affirmed Redd’s conviction and sentence but found the new trial issue was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. PettyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Beazley v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. OlveraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Rodriguez-ParraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Derrick WheatenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. William CrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Dwayne MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.