Legal Opinion

Boomer v. DePerio

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided December 23, 2005No. 03-CV-6348LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Solomon Boomer, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), alleges that defendants, all of whom at all relevant times were physicians employed by DOCS, violated his constitutional rights in connection with his treatment for diabetes. Defendants have moved for summary judgment. The motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed.

BACKGROUND

The complaint alleges that plaintiff suffers from diabetes, and that beginning…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Chance v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Isiah Carl Green v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Varela v. DemmonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Guarneri v. WestDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
  3. Boomer v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Price v. EngertDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
  5. Clemons v. Wyoming Correctional Facility MedicalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API