Legal Opinion
In Re Quincy Columbia Basin Irrigation District
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 1963No. 37003, 37113PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murray, J. †
These consolidated appeals arise from a special statutory proceeding seeking the confirmation of amendatory repayment contracts between two irrigation districts and the United States.
The two districts are the Quincy Columbia Basin Irrigation District in Grant County, herein called the Quincy District (cause No. 37003), and the South Columbia Basin Irrigation District in Franklin County, herein called the South District (cause No. 37113).
The amendatory repayment contracts involved here are quite similar, but each is separate, and each speaks only for its district. For a clear view…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Dissolution & Disorganization of Horse Heaven Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Kinnear v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Wells v. HartungWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Van Hollebeke v. WheelerIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. AgeeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Henry Julius Franz v. East Columbia Basin Irrigation District, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Badger Mountain Irrigation District Secured Bondholders' Committee v. Badger Mountain Irrigation District (In re Badger Mountain Irrigation District)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Badger Mountain Irrigation District, Debtor. Badger Mountain Irrigation District Secured Bondholders' Committee v. Badger Mountain Irrigation District, Badger Mountain Irrigation District Secured Bondholders' Committee v. Badger Mountain Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In re East Columbia Basin Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.