Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McCall v. Automatic Voting MacH. Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 20, 1938No. 1 Div. 992PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Section 190 of the Constitution of 1901, so far as applicable to the issue involved in this case, says: “The Legislature shall pass laws not inconsistent with this Constitution to regulate and govern elections, [a] and all such laws shall he uniform thmighout the State; and shall provide by law for the manner of holding elections and of ascertaining the result of the same, and shall provide general registration laws not inconsistent with the provisions of this article.” (Italics supplied.)

It is manifest, therefore, that all laws to be enacted by the Legislature…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Collman v. PittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Garrett v. CuninghameSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Austin v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Mobile County v. ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. State ex rel. Porter v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Price v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Mitchell v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Jansen v. State Ex Rel. DowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  4. E.H.G. v. E.R.G.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. State v. Bay Towing & Dredging CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API