Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Benson

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided May 1, 1959No. Civ. Nos. 1065, 1066PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, District Judge.

These actions, dismissed by stipulation as against Secretary of Agriculture *77Ezra T. Benson, were consolidated for purpose of trial. One was brought to set aside a determination by the Iowa State Stabilization and Conservation Committee forfeiting plaintiff’s 1957 payment under his “Soil Bank Acreage Reserve Agreement” and assessing a 50:% penalty against him, and the other one to set aside a like determination by the same Committee under the plaintiff’s “Soil Bank Conservation Reserve Contract” for the same year, but on another tract and for a different amount.

The State…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas J. Maxwell, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Glen H. Shay Et Ux. v. Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation State Committee for ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Gould v. Barnes Brokerage Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1972
  4. Holden v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1960
  5. White v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API