Legal Opinion

Ingram v. United BioSource Corporation

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 22, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02238Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS K. K. INGRAM, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-2238-EFM UNITED BIOSOURCE CORP., Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff K. K. Ingram brings suit against Defendant United BioSource Corporation (“UBC”) for wrongful termination. Plaintiff claims she is a protected whistleblower under Kansas law because Defendant terminated Plaintiff’s employment only after she reported violations of state and federal law within Defendant’s company. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 46) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Mitchell v. City of MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Lifewise Master Funding v. TelebankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API