Legal Opinion

Urbano v. Meneses

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1981No. 2479 October Term, 1978PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

This case was initiated in equity by Josephine, Roland and Nicholas Urbano against Upper Merion Township, its zoning board and two of the Township’s solicitors. The defendants *106filed preliminary objections to the Urbanos’ complaint. The court sustained the preliminary objections of the Township and of the individual zoning board members, saying that the complaint failed to state a cause of action against the Township and that the zoning board members were immune as high public officials. The court, however, overruled the objections of the defendant solicitors. From…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Omnipoint Corporation v. Zoning Hearing Board Of Pine Grove TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Karen Overall and Arthur Dunham v. University of Pennsylvania Gail SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Greenberg, M. v. McGraw, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Temtex Products, Inc. v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Delate v. KolleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API